Tribal Gas Tax Exemption Under Fire

Erik Smith/ Washington State Wire

A group representing nontribal gas station owners says the tribes get an unfair tax break that lets them beat the competition on price. Under compacts with 16 tribes, Washington state gives them a 75 percent discount from state gas taxes. There are 51 tribal gas stations in Washington, where fuel prices are consistently 7 to 12 cents a gallon less than at other stations due in part to the tax rebate. If tribes were to pay the full amount, the state would reap an additional $30 million a year to fix highways.

In 2007, the Legislature passed a law allowing Gregoire to make fuel-tax compacts with the tribes. When they buy fuel, the tribes pay the full wholesale price, including 38 cents a gallon tax upfront. The state sends them a rebate check for 75 percent of the tax.

The Automotive United Trades Organization (AUTO), which represents nontribal service stations, is suing the state. AUTO argues that the existing compacts violate the state constitution, because the 18th Amendment requires gas taxes be used only for highway purposes. The state counters that, based on court rulings, it would collect no fuel tax at all from tribes if it weren't for the compacts. Tribes are required to use the tax rebates for transportation, and often do, but details of how the money is spent are exempt from public disclosure.

"No one but the tribes know, and they will not let anyone look at their books," said Tim Hamilton, a former Grays Harbor-area station owner and executive director of AUTO. The Puyallup Tribe voluntarily posts a description of its road projects and some cost information on its website. Audit reports by the tribes are typically provided to the Department of Licensing, but those cannot be reviewed by the public or lawmakers.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.nativelegalupdate.com/admin/trackback/268603
Comments (2) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
dbeetso - January 13, 2012 2:01 PM

"The state counters that, based on court rulings, it would collect no fuel tax at all from tribes if it weren't for the compacts." . . . exactly.

Karen Boda - January 15, 2012 4:56 AM

The original agreement must be upheld and any attempts to alter this compact should require the Agreement between the two mutual parties in order to amend. Failure to so is unethical and could mark the beginning of exploitation...I Fully support tribal sovreignty/independence and the Automotive Unite Trade Organization (AUTO) needs to cast covetous eyes Elsewhere. The Greed displayed by the money hungry fat cats at AUTO? They need to GET OVER IT! We need to tell AUTO: "Back off evil, negative capitalist's as your presence and accompanying nosiness are very unappealing and makes you look resentful, jealous. and Petty." Don't they have enough money? Constantly grasping for more--like a unchecked child in a candystore--AUTO's actions too must be checked, reigned in. Tribal legalities are private and continued harrassment from these money moguls looks like bully's trying to take advantage of an (inaccurately) perceived weakness in tribal legislation. Original compact(s) must be maintained, not altered.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.